Now I do not have a lot of time to spend on this subject b/c I have to go to work. I think the govt. installed a chip in my brain and it is telling me I must leave the house by 7:20. hmm
Now I believe that the right to bear arms is more than extremely important. I think it is crucial to the survival of our country. It is like owning a Marilyn Manson cd. It is something we all should do.
There are rules about owning a gun. I will not get into them all now and heck I doubt I know all of them. However, my question is about morals. How can we say just b/c someone is supspected of a crime but not found guilty they should not own a gun? I do not believe we can do that.
Protecting the rights of would-be gun owners and making sure that guns aren't for sale to suspected terrorists should be entirely separate matters.
I do not think I agree with this. Freedom does not come without a price. How muc freedom are we willing to give up for a 'feeling' of safety?
I would like to keep the people I suspect to be serial killers, oh yes you are out there, away from their weapon of choice as well. However, I can not prove you damn freaks to be guilty yet so I can not keep you away from your twine and your butter knife. You damn freak.
Anyways, we can not keep people from a car because they might or might not drink and drive.
I do not believe we can say I think you might be doing something so therefore you can not have a gun.
Note:
I base all of this on the word suspect.
Monday, March 14, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment